Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tihomir Grozdanov vs Salvatore Caruso Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Grozdanov vs Caruso analysis and find out who is favored!
Tihomir Grozdanov vs Salvatore Caruso Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Grozdanov 1 - 0 Caruso
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grozdanov has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Caruso has won 49.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grozdanov, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Caruso has won 56.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grozdanov has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Caruso has saved 49.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grozdanov has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Caruso winning 50.88% (W/L 29/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grozdanov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 179/ 135), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14). Caruso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 253/ 197), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 41/ 54).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Grozdanov winning 1 times and Caruso being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Grozdanov winning 2 and Caruso winning 0. The last match between Grozdanov and Caruso was at the Croatia F4, 11-03-2013, Semifinals, Clay with Tihomir Grozdanov getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Grozdanov and Caruso have played a deciding set 0 times, with Grozdanov winning 0 times and Caruso 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Grozdanov winning 0, and Caruso 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grozdanov has played against opponents with an average rank of while Caruso has played against players with an average rank of 281.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grozdanov has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Caruso has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grozdanov has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Caruso has converted 48.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
394
High
37
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
426
Rank
76
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
55% (219-178)
Career Total W/L
54% (417-355)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
47% (9-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$927,160
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tihomir Grozdanov | Salvatore Caruso |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tihomir Grozdanov | Salvatore Caruso |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (9/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (23/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (215/220) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 247.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (734/1315) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (482/734) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (285/581) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (68/140) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (558/1351) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (9/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 10% (10/1) |
Tihomir Grozdanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Tihomir Grozdanov
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Vasil Yehorov
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Tihomir Grozdanov
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Skyler Butts
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Jannik Rother
46%
(
37 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Salvatore Caruso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Salvatore Caruso
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
15 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Pietro Marino
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Diogo Marques
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Salvatore Caruso
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Timofey Skatov
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Grozdanov Vs Caruso Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
